Jump to content

Talk:The Cat in the Hat

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleThe Cat in the Hat has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 2, 2013Good article nomineeListed
November 18, 2024Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

GA concerns

[edit]

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria due to sourcing problems in the "Adaptaions" section. Many statements are uncited, and there are some unreliable sources used. Is anyone willing to address this concern, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 22:01, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Kept. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:37, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The "Adaptions" section contains many unsourced statements, including entire paragraphs, and uses unreliable sources. Z1720 (talk) 16:04, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removed the unsourced Russian claim, cited the video game. The rest of the material seems to be reliably sourced: none of the sources are redlisted. I've reorganised the material slightly and removed the most trivial stuff. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:28, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ref 71 (to cracked.com) should probably be replaced, and other mediums expanded if able, but unsourced statements are resolved. Z1720 (talk) 14:46, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.